Comparative human rights law /

Сохранить в:
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Fredman, Sandra
Формат:
Язык:английский
Опубликовано: Oxford University Press, 2018
Предметы:
Метки: Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
_version_ 1831272902854443008
author Fredman, Sandra
author_facet Fredman, Sandra
author_role
author_sort Fredman, Sandra
author_variant s f sf
building CSSSC Library
contents Foreign fads or fashions : the role of comparativism in human rights law -- What is a human right? : dealing with disagreement -- Challenging the divide : socio-economic rights as human rights -- Allies or subversives? : adjudication and democracy -- Interpreting human rights law -- Capital punishment -- Abortion -- The right to health -- The rights to housing -- Freedom of speech -- The right to education -- Freedom of religion.
format Book
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02875cam a2200253 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="003">IN-CaCSS</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20250312171235.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180723t20182018enk b 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780199689415 (paperback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">CSSSC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7FRE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fredman, Sandra</subfield><subfield code="9">9873</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative human rights law /</subfield><subfield code="c">Sandra Fredman.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford :</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxxvi, 476 pages ;</subfield><subfield code="c">26 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreign fads or fashions : the role of comparativism in human rights law -- What is a human right? : dealing with disagreement -- Challenging the divide : socio-economic rights as human rights -- Allies or subversives? : adjudication and democracy -- Interpreting human rights law -- Capital punishment -- Abortion -- The right to health -- The rights to housing -- Freedom of speech -- The right to education -- Freedom of religion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Courts in different jurisdictions face similar human rights questions. Does the death penalty breach human rights? Does freedom of speech include racist speech? Is there a right to health? This book uses the prism of comparative law to examine the fascinating ways in which these difficult questions are decided. On the one hand, the shared language of human rights suggests that there should be similar solutions to comparable problems. On the other hand, there are important differences. Constitutional texts are worded differently; courts have differing relationships with the legislature; and there are divergences in socio-economic development, politics, and history. Nevertheless, there is a growing transnational conversation between courts, with cases in one jurisdiction being cited in others. Part I sets out the cross-cutting themes which shape the ways judges respond to challenging human rights issues. It examines when it is legitimate to refer to foreign materials; how universality and cultural relativity are balanced in human rights law; the appropriate role of courts in adjudicating human rights in a democracy; and the principles judges use to interpret human rights texts. The book is unusual in transcending the distinction between socio-economic rights and civil and political rights. Part II applies these cross-cutting themes to comparing human rights law in the US, UK, South Africa, Canada, and India. Its focus is on seven particularly challenging issues: the death penalty, abortion, housing, health, speech, education and religion, with the aim of inspiring further comparative examination of other pressing human rights issues.--</subfield><subfield code="c">Source other than Library of Congress.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human rights.</subfield><subfield code="9">4883</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social rights.</subfield><subfield code="9">9874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Civil rights.</subfield><subfield code="9">9061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Human rights.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield><subfield code="0">(OCoLC)fst00963285</subfield><subfield code="9">4883</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">udc</subfield><subfield code="c">BK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="0">0</subfield><subfield code="1">0</subfield><subfield code="2">udc</subfield><subfield code="4">0</subfield><subfield code="6">3427FRE</subfield><subfield code="7">0</subfield><subfield code="9">36979</subfield><subfield code="a">CSSSC</subfield><subfield code="b">CSSSC</subfield><subfield code="d">2025-03-12</subfield><subfield code="e">Gifted by Suprio Ghosh.</subfield><subfield code="l">0</subfield><subfield code="o">342.7FRE</subfield><subfield code="p">G-8404</subfield><subfield code="r">2025-03-12 00:00:00</subfield><subfield code="w">2025-03-12</subfield><subfield code="y">BK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">33500</subfield><subfield code="d">33500</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id csssc.33500
illustrated Not Illustrated
institution Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta
isbn 9780199689415 (paperback)
language English
marc_error [first_indexed]Unable to connect to VuFind database; Communications link failure The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
[last_indexed]Unable to connect to VuFind database; Communications link failure The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
physical xxxvi, 476 pages ; 26 cm
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press,
record_format XML
spelling Fredman, Sandra 9873
Comparative human rights law / Sandra Fredman.
Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018.
xxxvi, 476 pages ; 26 cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Foreign fads or fashions : the role of comparativism in human rights law -- What is a human right? : dealing with disagreement -- Challenging the divide : socio-economic rights as human rights -- Allies or subversives? : adjudication and democracy -- Interpreting human rights law -- Capital punishment -- Abortion -- The right to health -- The rights to housing -- Freedom of speech -- The right to education -- Freedom of religion.
Courts in different jurisdictions face similar human rights questions. Does the death penalty breach human rights? Does freedom of speech include racist speech? Is there a right to health? This book uses the prism of comparative law to examine the fascinating ways in which these difficult questions are decided. On the one hand, the shared language of human rights suggests that there should be similar solutions to comparable problems. On the other hand, there are important differences. Constitutional texts are worded differently; courts have differing relationships with the legislature; and there are divergences in socio-economic development, politics, and history. Nevertheless, there is a growing transnational conversation between courts, with cases in one jurisdiction being cited in others. Part I sets out the cross-cutting themes which shape the ways judges respond to challenging human rights issues. It examines when it is legitimate to refer to foreign materials; how universality and cultural relativity are balanced in human rights law; the appropriate role of courts in adjudicating human rights in a democracy; and the principles judges use to interpret human rights texts. The book is unusual in transcending the distinction between socio-economic rights and civil and political rights. Part II applies these cross-cutting themes to comparing human rights law in the US, UK, South Africa, Canada, and India. Its focus is on seven particularly challenging issues: the death penalty, abortion, housing, health, speech, education and religion, with the aim of inspiring further comparative examination of other pressing human rights issues.-- Source other than Library of Congress.
Human rights. 4883
Social rights. 9874
Civil rights. 9061
Human rights. fast (OCoLC)fst00963285 4883
spellingShingle Fredman, Sandra
Comparative human rights law /
Foreign fads or fashions : the role of comparativism in human rights law -- What is a human right? : dealing with disagreement -- Challenging the divide : socio-economic rights as human rights -- Allies or subversives? : adjudication and democracy -- Interpreting human rights law -- Capital punishment -- Abortion -- The right to health -- The rights to housing -- Freedom of speech -- The right to education -- Freedom of religion.
Human rights. 4883
Social rights. 9874
Civil rights. 9061
Human rights. fast (OCoLC)fst00963285 4883
title Comparative human rights law /
title_auth Comparative human rights law /
title_full Comparative human rights law / Sandra Fredman.
title_fullStr Comparative human rights law / Sandra Fredman.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative human rights law / Sandra Fredman.
title_short Comparative human rights law /
title_sort comparative human rights law
topic Human rights. 4883
Social rights. 9874
Civil rights. 9061
Human rights. fast (OCoLC)fst00963285 4883
topic_facet Human rights.
Social rights.
Civil rights.
work_keys_str_mv AT fredmansandra comparativehumanrightslaw